रुसी महिला मार्ता येगोरोवनेमले पि|mजमा उक्त लास दुई वर्षदेखि राखेको बताएकी छिन्।
मार्ताका अनुसार उक्त विचित्रको लास पश्चिम रूसको पेत्रोजावेदस्क सहरमा भेटिएको
थियो। महिलाले त्यसको पाँचवटा तस्बिर खिचेकी छिन्। मृत एलियनको लम्बाइ दुई फिट छ।
उक्त एलियन सन् २००९ मा युएफओबाट उत्रिएको अनुमान गरिएको छ। यसको टाउको हलिउड
चलत्रिमा देखाइने एलियनकै जस्तो छ। आँखा वल्भजस्तो छ। त्यसको सानो लौरोजस्तो एउटा
हात पनि छ।
मार्ताका अनुसार उनले एउटा जलिरहेको चीज देखिन्। जब उनले नजिक पुगेर आगो हटाइन् तब एलियन देखिन्। उक्त एलियनको शव कुनै माछाको जस्तो छ। मार्ताले उक्त शव उठाएर पि|mजमा स्टोर गरेकी थिइन्। केही दिनअघि रूसी विज्ञान एकेडेमीको कारेलियन रिसर्च सेन्टरले उक्त शव लगेको मार्ताले डेलीमेल पत्रिकालाई बताएकी छिन्। प्यारानर्मल गतिविधिका विशेषज्ञ माइकल कोहेनले यो असली एलियन हुन सक्ने जनाएका छन्।
पछिल्ला केही महिनामा रूसमा एलियन पाइएको यो तेस्रो घटना हो। मार्ताले उक्त एलियनको शव आफ्नो समर हाउस नजिक २००९ मा भेटेकी थिइन्।
In English
South Africa at the invitation of Michael Tellinger (author of “Slave Species of God“), to lecture at his first annual conference in Johannesburg: UFOs, Science, and Consciousness. I will be among 15 speakers from around the world, and I am very excited to be a part of this grand new event.
मार्ताका अनुसार उनले एउटा जलिरहेको चीज देखिन्। जब उनले नजिक पुगेर आगो हटाइन् तब एलियन देखिन्। उक्त एलियनको शव कुनै माछाको जस्तो छ। मार्ताले उक्त शव उठाएर पि|mजमा स्टोर गरेकी थिइन्। केही दिनअघि रूसी विज्ञान एकेडेमीको कारेलियन रिसर्च सेन्टरले उक्त शव लगेको मार्ताले डेलीमेल पत्रिकालाई बताएकी छिन्। प्यारानर्मल गतिविधिका विशेषज्ञ माइकल कोहेनले यो असली एलियन हुन सक्ने जनाएका छन्।
पछिल्ला केही महिनामा रूसमा एलियन पाइएको यो तेस्रो घटना हो। मार्ताले उक्त एलियनको शव आफ्नो समर हाउस नजिक २००९ मा भेटेकी थिइन्।
In English
South Africa at the invitation of Michael Tellinger (author of “Slave Species of God“), to lecture at his first annual conference in Johannesburg: UFOs, Science, and Consciousness. I will be among 15 speakers from around the world, and I am very excited to be a part of this grand new event.
That said, I am definitely NOT looking forward to 18 hours of flight each way, but I couldn’t legitimately call myself a serious researcher into human origins if I didn’t seize this golden opportunity to visit the “Abzu,” the home of the Anunnaki gold mines (yes, the pun was intended).
I’ll be speaking for 90 minutes, doing about an hour on the new Intevention Theory eBook, and a half-hour summary of where things are now with the Starchild Skull, focusing on the DNA analysis. Michael intends to film all aspects of the conference, all speakers, so those who want the DVD of it should contact him and put in an early order for it. It should be fascinating!
The infant Conehead mummy recently found in Cuzco, Peru has caused about 100 people from around the world to contact me about the many articles and reports featuring it in the past couple of days. All of those people want to know my thoughts about this astounding relic that has been examined by three anthropologists who have announced that it looks to be alien rather than human. The only aspect of this story that is a surprise to me is that mainstream anthropologists are actually giving it real credence as what all Coneheads so obviously seem to be—NOT human.
For at least a dozen years I’ve been saying that Conehead skulls are clearly not entirely human, if human at all. Yes, they have a human-LIKE face, but they have brains that are literally twice the size of normal human brains. And how does the mainstream explain this difference? With exactly what you see in the article I’ve linked below: the same excuse they use to explain the strange shape of the Starchild Skull—deliberate head binding.
The Starchild’s brain volume is 400 cubic centimeters more than it should be. The Conehead brains are 1400 to 1600 more than they should be! Literally twice the size of normal human brains! So how does head binding not only reshape the head, but greatly expand the brain size at the same time? The painting of the Native American in the article proves my point—her head is reshaped, but not in the least enlarged because that is simply not possible.
I think this remarkable discovery deserves every bit of the close scientific scrutiny we have been trying for so long to arrange for the Starchild. Look at its eye sockets! Look at their size! They’re not like the Starchild’s, they’re something entirely different, but certainly not human, in the same way the Starchild’s eye sockets are not human. Human-LIKE, yes, but NOT human.
Look at the size of its head! The body is the size of an infant, and the skull’s fontanelle (the area of the “soft spot” on a human infant) has not yet closed, yet there seems to be adult type teeth in the mouth! This is very puzzling to me, and forces me to make some rather wild speculations. What kind of being has teeth in infancy? Or, conversely, what kind of being is so tiny as an adult that it has adult teeth but cranial bones that have not sutured?
All I can say is what I’ve been saying all along: the Coneheads need to be as fully analyzed scientifically as I’m trying to make happen with the Starchild. And to that end, I can let you all in on this: I have become friends with a man who lives in Peru named Brien Foerster. Brien runs tours to all the unusual places down there, and many of you have seen him on the TV show “Ancient Aliens.” He will be on it again next season. He is a new force in our field.
Earlier this year Brien was able to secure bone and skin samples from four different Conehead skulls, which he passed to me, and I have in turn passed them to the geneticist working on the Starchild Skull’s DNA recovery. As is always the case, we don’t have nearly enough money to do what should be done with those Conehead samples, but the geneticist does intend to try to make some very basic recoveries to tell us whatever can be discovered for a minimal amount of money. When we can make more of an investment in those samples, as with the Starchild Skull, you can be certain we will.
Now we have two solid chances to make history, one with the Starchild, and one with the Conehead samples. I have always believed the Coneheads would prove to be non-human, just as I know for a fact now that the Starchild will prove to be definitely not human. But the amazing thing is that the Starchild and the Coneheads are from two entirely different types of beings! I don’t know what the rest of the Starchild’s body looked like, but we do have postcranial Conehead bodies, as seen in the small mummified one recently found in Cuzco.
This is, at the very least, one of the most cutting of the cutting edges in science right now, yet it’s a subject that virtually no credentialed scientists dare to acknowledge. I’m astounded, frankly, that the Spanish and Russian anthropologists have stuck their necks out to say they think it’s alien. But sooner or later this is where science has to go. Sooner or later they have to face up to things like the Starchild, and the Coneheads, and see them for what they are …. definitely human-LIKE, but just as definitely NOT human.
If you doubt what I’m saying, take four minutes to watch this video about strange skulls, most of which are coneheads, and see what YOU think…..
And now we turn to a very sad announcement for me…..
No comments:
Post a Comment